Re: [PATCH RFC v4 5/6] firmware/efi: Process CXL Component Events

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Smita Koralahalli wrote:
> Hi Ira,
> 
> I tested this out. Just one correction below to make it work.
> 

[snip]

> > +
> > +#define CPER_CXL_DEVICE_ID_VALID		BIT(0)
> > +#define CPER_CXL_DEVICE_SN_VALID		BIT(1)
> > +#define CPER_CXL_COMP_EVENT_LOG_VALID		BIT(2)
> > +struct cper_cxl_event_rec {
> > +	struct {
> > +		u32 length;
> > +		u64 validation_bits;
> > +		struct cper_cxl_event_devid {
> > +			u16 vendor_id;
> > +			u16 device_id;
> > +			u8 func_num;
> > +			u8 device_num;
> > +			u8 bus_num;
> > +			u16 segment_num;
> > +			u16 slot_num; /* bits 2:0 reserved */
> > +			u8 reserved;
> > +		} device_id;
> > +		struct cper_cxl_event_sn {
> > +			u32 lower_dw;
> > +			u32 upper_dw;
> > +		} dev_serial_num;
> > +	} hdr;
> > +
> > +	union cxl_event event;
> > +} __packed;
> 
> __packed attribute just for cper_cxl_event_rec still fails to properly 
> align structure elements. Looks like, __packed attribute is needed for 
> all structs (cper_cxl_event_devid and cper_cxl_event_sn) inside 
> cper_cxl_event_rec.
> 
> Seems easier to use global pragma instead.. I could test and obtain the 
> output as expected using pragma..

I did not know that was acceptable in the kernel but I see you used it in
cper_cxl.h before...

Ok I'll do that and spin again.

Thanks so much for testing this!  I was out last week and still don't have
a test environment.

Ira




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux