Hi Xiao, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on linus/master] [also build test ERROR on v6.6-rc2 next-20230920] [cannot apply to efi/next] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Xiao-Wang/riscv-Rearrange-hwcap-h-and-cpufeature-h/20230920-154024 base: linus/master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920074653.2509631-2-xiao.w.wang%40intel.com patch subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] riscv: Rearrange hwcap.h and cpufeature.h config: riscv-rv32_defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230920/202309201921.GvBmYK5q-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config) compiler: riscv32-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230920/202309201921.GvBmYK5q-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <yujie.liu@xxxxxxxxx> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202309201921.GvBmYK5q-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): fs/binfmt_elf.c: In function 'create_elf_tables': >> arch/riscv/include/asm/elf.h:70:25: error: implicit declaration of function 'riscv_get_elf_hwcap'; did you mean 'riscv_fill_hwcap'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 70 | #define ELF_HWCAP riscv_get_elf_hwcap() | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/binfmt_elf.c:248:31: note: in definition of macro 'NEW_AUX_ENT' 248 | *elf_info++ = val; \ | ^~~ fs/binfmt_elf.c:260:31: note: in expansion of macro 'ELF_HWCAP' 260 | NEW_AUX_ENT(AT_HWCAP, ELF_HWCAP); | ^~~~~~~~~ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors -- arch/riscv/kvm/main.c: In function 'riscv_kvm_init': >> arch/riscv/kvm/main.c:73:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'riscv_isa_extension_available' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 73 | if (!riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, h)) { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> arch/riscv/kvm/main.c:73:50: error: 'h' undeclared (first use in this function) 73 | if (!riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, h)) { | ^ arch/riscv/kvm/main.c:73:50: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in cc1: some warnings being treated as errors -- arch/riscv/kvm/tlb.c: In function 'kvm_riscv_local_hfence_gvma_vmid_gpa': >> arch/riscv/kvm/tlb.c:18:25: error: implicit declaration of function 'riscv_has_extension_unlikely' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 18 | #define has_svinval() riscv_has_extension_unlikely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVINVAL) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/riscv/kvm/tlb.c:31:13: note: in expansion of macro 'has_svinval' 31 | if (has_svinval()) { | ^~~~~~~~~~~ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors -- arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c: In function 'kvm_riscv_vcpu_fp_reset': >> arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:22:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'riscv_isa_extension_available' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 22 | if (riscv_isa_extension_available(vcpu->arch.isa, f) || | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:22:59: error: 'f' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fd'? 22 | if (riscv_isa_extension_available(vcpu->arch.isa, f) || | ^ | fd arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:22:59: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in >> arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:23:59: error: 'd' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fd'? 23 | riscv_isa_extension_available(vcpu->arch.isa, d)) | ^ | fd arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c: In function 'kvm_riscv_vcpu_guest_fp_save': arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:39:56: error: 'd' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fd'? 39 | if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isa, d)) | ^ | fd arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:41:61: error: 'f' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fd'? 41 | else if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isa, f)) | ^ | fd arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c: In function 'kvm_riscv_vcpu_guest_fp_restore': arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:51:56: error: 'd' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fd'? 51 | if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isa, d)) | ^ | fd arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:53:61: error: 'f' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fd'? 53 | else if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isa, f)) | ^ | fd arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c: In function 'kvm_riscv_vcpu_host_fp_save': arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:62:49: error: 'd' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fd'? 62 | if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, d)) | ^ | fd arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:64:54: error: 'f' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fd'? 64 | else if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, f)) | ^ | fd arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c: In function 'kvm_riscv_vcpu_host_fp_restore': arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:70:49: error: 'd' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fd'? 70 | if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, d)) | ^ | fd arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:72:54: error: 'f' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fd'? 72 | else if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, f)) | ^ | fd arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c: In function 'kvm_riscv_vcpu_get_reg_fp': arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:90:59: error: 'f' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fd'? 90 | riscv_isa_extension_available(vcpu->arch.isa, f)) { | ^ | fd arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:101:66: error: 'd' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fd'? 101 | riscv_isa_extension_available(vcpu->arch.isa, d)) { | ^ | fd arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c: In function 'kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_reg_fp': arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:135:59: error: 'f' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fd'? 135 | riscv_isa_extension_available(vcpu->arch.isa, f)) { | ^ | fd arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:146:66: error: 'd' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fd'? 146 | riscv_isa_extension_available(vcpu->arch.isa, d)) { | ^ | fd cc1: some warnings being treated as errors -- arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_timer.c: In function 'kvm_riscv_vcpu_timer_init': >> arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_timer.c:256:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'riscv_isa_extension_available' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 256 | if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, SSTC)) { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_timer.c:256:49: error: 'SSTC' undeclared (first use in this function) 256 | if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, SSTC)) { | ^~~~ arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_timer.c:256:49: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in cc1: some warnings being treated as errors -- arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c: In function 'kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_init': >> arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c:556:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'riscv_isa_extension_available' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 556 | if (!riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, SSCOFPMF)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c:556:50: error: 'SSCOFPMF' undeclared (first use in this function) 556 | if (!riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, SSCOFPMF)) | ^~~~~~~~ arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c:556:50: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in cc1: some warnings being treated as errors -- arch/riscv/kvm/aia.c: In function 'kvm_riscv_aia_init': >> arch/riscv/kvm/aia.c:604:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'riscv_isa_extension_available' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 604 | if (!riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, SxAIA)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> arch/riscv/kvm/aia.c:604:50: error: 'SxAIA' undeclared (first use in this function) 604 | if (!riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, SxAIA)) | ^~~~~ arch/riscv/kvm/aia.c:604:50: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in cc1: some warnings being treated as errors -- drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c: In function 'pmu_sbi_setup_irqs': >> drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c:803:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'riscv_isa_extension_available' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 803 | if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, SSCOFPMF)) { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c:803:49: error: 'SSCOFPMF' undeclared (first use in this function) 803 | if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, SSCOFPMF)) { | ^~~~~~~~ drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c:803:49: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +70 arch/riscv/include/asm/elf.h 2350bd192fa2d9 Palmer Dabbelt 2023-02-02 64 2129a235c09896 Palmer Dabbelt 2017-07-10 65 /* 2350bd192fa2d9 Palmer Dabbelt 2023-02-02 66 * Provides information on the availiable set of ISA extensions to userspace, 2350bd192fa2d9 Palmer Dabbelt 2023-02-02 67 * via a bitmap that coorespends to each single-letter ISA extension. This is 2350bd192fa2d9 Palmer Dabbelt 2023-02-02 68 * essentially defunct, but will remain for compatibility with userspace. 2129a235c09896 Palmer Dabbelt 2017-07-10 69 */ 50724efcb370c6 Andy Chiu 2023-06-05 @70 #define ELF_HWCAP riscv_get_elf_hwcap() 2129a235c09896 Palmer Dabbelt 2017-07-10 71 extern unsigned long elf_hwcap; 2129a235c09896 Palmer Dabbelt 2017-07-10 72 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
