On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 14:00, Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 01:49:37PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > UEFI v2.10 extends the EFI memory attributes table with a flag that > > indicates whether or not all RuntimeServicesCode regions were > > constructed with BTI landing pads, permitting the OS to map these > > regions with BTI restrictions enabled. > > > > So let's take this into account on arm64. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- > > arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 6 ++++++ > > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c > > index 78ffd5aaddcbbaee..99971cd349f36310 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c > > @@ -96,15 +96,23 @@ int __init efi_create_mapping(struct mm_struct *mm, efi_memory_desc_t *md) > > return 0; > > } > > > > +struct set_perm_data { > > + const efi_memory_desc_t *md; > > + bool has_bti; > > +}; > > + > > static int __init set_permissions(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long addr, void *data) > > { > > - efi_memory_desc_t *md = data; > > + struct set_perm_data *spd = data; > > + const efi_memory_desc_t *md = spd->md; > > pte_t pte = READ_ONCE(*ptep); > > > > if (md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_RO) > > pte = set_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_RDONLY)); > > if (md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_XP) > > pte = set_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_PXN)); > > + else if (system_supports_bti() && spd->has_bti) > > system_supports_bti() seems to check CONFIG_ARM64_BTI rather than > CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL. In theory, I think this means we could have > mismatched BTI support, so it might be slightly more robust to use the > latter option here even thought the runtime services aren't kernel code. > > What do you think? > v1 checked for CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL as well, but I dropped it because we can do the enforcement even without it. I'm not sure how mismatched BTI support factors into that, though, given that CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL is set at compile time. You mean mismatched between cores, right?