Re: [PATCH v2 03/16] x86/compressed: efi-mixed: move bootargs parsing out of 32-bit startup code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 01:29:55PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Documentation/x86/boot.rst has a section on this (at the end),

Ah, and I really like that NOTE at the end.

> but we should really stop using it. It is only implemented by
> out-of-tree GRUB at the moment (last time I checked) and leaking all
> those struct bootparams specific details into every bootloader is not
> great, especially the ones that intend to be generic and boot any EFI
> OS on any EFI arch.

I'm all for making early asm code simpler so yes, can we start removing
it?

Dunno, maybe ifdef around it with a Kconfig option which is default off
and see who complains...

> That is the same thing. The EFI stub is what enables the kernel (or
> decompressor) to masquerade as a PE/COFF executable.
> 
> In short, every EFI stub kernel on every architecture has a native
> PE/COFF entry point that calls the EFI stub, and the EFi stub does the
> arch-specific bootloader work and boots it.

Right.

> In addition, the x86_64 EFI stub kernel has an extra, non-native
> PE/COFF entry point, which is exposed in a way that is not covered by
> the EFI spec, but which allows Linux specific loaders such as
> systemd-boot to boot such kernels on 32-bit firmware without having to
> do the whole struct bootparams dance in the bootloader.

Ok, thanks for explaining.

I like the simplification and obviating the need for the bootloader to
do any dancing before loading the kernel.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux