EFI zboot on LoongArch [was: LoongArch: Add efistub booting support]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > > > > So screen_info is a global variable in the core kernel. For the zboot
> > > > > case (our own implementation, not sure about the proposing new
> > > > > method), efistub may be able to fill this info, but while
> > > > > decompressing, screen_info will be overwritten. I think.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Right. So you can drop it then.
> > > OK, then can we rename LINUX_EFI_ARM_SCREEN_INFO_TABLE_GUID to
> > > LINUX_EFI_SCREEN_INFO_TABLE_GUID and avoid define a dedicated GUID for
> > > each arch?
> > >
> >
> > If you use the arm64 approach, you don't need a GUID at all.
> Oh, I misunderstood.
> OK, I will use the arm64 approach now, my problem only exists when the
> order is "stub, decompression, core-kernel". If the new zboot way is
> "decompression, stub, core-kernel", then there is no problem.
>

Indeed.

I am trying to port the generic EFI zboot support to LoongArch, but I
am running into a problem:

The zboot EFI image consists of

zImage.o, created with objcopy -O binary
zboot-header.o, created using the assembler
libstub.a, created as usual

This results in errors such as
arch/loongarch/boot/zboot-header.o: can't link different ABI object.
failed to merge target specific data of file arch/loongarch/boot/zboot-header.o

which I think is caused by the fact that objcopy does not set the LP64
soft float flags on the ELF object it creates.

Do you see any way around this limitation?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux