On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 12:05:15PM +0200, Maximilian Luz wrote: > On 7/28/22 10:23, Sudeep Holla wrote: [...] > > Worst case I am fine with that as this needs to be one of and future > > platforms must get their act right in designing their f/w interface. > > Again, I fully agree with you that this situation shouldn't exist. But > reality is sadly different. > As I mentioned I don't have final authority to say yes or no to DT bindings. I have expressed my opinion and I thing allowing this to be generic via DT bindings gives no incentive to get the firmware story right. Hence I am happy to see this as one-off driver change and then we more changes are added to the driver or similar drivers get added in the future, we have a change to demand what action has been taken to fix the firmware story. Just adding DT support(which I disagree) will make future platform to just use it and not get improvements in areas of discovery or query from the firmware. -- Regards, Sudeep
