Re: [PATCH] efi/x86: use naked RET on mixed mode call wrapper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 11:34:02AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Why would we have to protect the kernel from EFI?

Yes, we cleared this up on IRC in the meantime.

This was raised as a concern in case we don't trust EFI. But we cannot
not (double negation on purpose) trust EFI because it can do whatever it
likes anyway, "underneath" the OS.

I'm keeping the UNTRAIN_RET-in-C diff in my patches/ folder, though - I
get the feeling we might need it soon for something else.

:-)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Martje Boudien Moerman
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux