Re: [PATCH 0/4] efivar: remove inappropriate uses of the efivar API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The efivar layer is a caching non-volatile variable store abstraction
> that is normally backed by EFI, but in some cases, might be backed by
> Google SMI firmware interfaces instead.
>
> It is mainly used by efivarfs and EFI pstore, both of which actually
> need the caching and abstraction properties. However, there are a few
> other occurrences where efivar is not necessary, or used in an invalid
> way. So let's fix this up, and remove some impediments to refactoring
> and cleaning up the efivars layer in the future.
>
> Assuming there are no objections to these changes, I intend to queue
> them up in the EFI tree fairly soon, so that ongoing work depending on
> these changes can continue as well.
>

[...]

>  drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/firmware.c |  25 ++---
>  drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/uefi.c                |  96 ++++++------------

Feel free to take the wireless patches via your tree:

Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux