On 03/02/2022 8:16, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Hi, > >>> I think the module should fail noisily. See above for autoload. In >>> case the module is loaded (either manually by the admin, or because >>> efi.coco_secret != EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR) and it can't actually load >>> the secrets we want know why ... >> >> Note that the AmdSev build of OVMF always publishes >> LINUX_EFI_COCO_SECRET_TABLE_GUID in the EFI table. Even when >> LAUNCH_SECRET was not executed. In such cases the secret area will be >> empty. > > Hmm, ok. Why? I assume the secret area is filled by the host and ovmf > doesn't even look at it? > Exactly. OVMF just reserves this area, and puts its address+size in the EFI config table. It doesn't care about its format and usage. There are currently two "users" for the actual data in this memory area: 1. grub's efisecret module (which reads the disk passphrase from an entry in the secret area) 2. linux's efi_secret module (which we're discussing here) >> If we keep only the 'efi.coco_secret != EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR' check, >> we'll get errors from efi_secret for every VM launch that doesn't >> undergo LAUNCH_SECRET. I don't think that's good. > > Well, if that is a common case the module could either print nothing or > log KERN_INFO level instead of KERN_ERROR. > What if the user doesn't inject a secret and doesn't include the efi_secret module at all in the initrd? request_module("efi_secret") will fail. I can ignore the error code of request_module("efi_secret") but that feels bad. >> If we *do* want to check that the area starts with >> EFI_SECRET_TABLE_HEADER_GUID (like I think we should), we need all the >> checks before that, like checking that the area is big enough, and that >> all the memremap()s succeed -- before actually comparing the >> header_guid. The checks are basically prerequisites for calling >> efi_guidcmp() safely. > > It is still not fully clear to me why you want do that check twice. > I want to load the module only if secrets were injected by the Guest Owner. Again, I'm open to ideas on how to de-duplicate these early checks, if that's important. -Dov