Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Implement generic cc_platform_has() helper function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Implement generic cc_platform_has() helper function
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 23:40:28 +0200
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>, Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>, Dave Young <dyoung@xxxxxxxxxx>, David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>, Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, VMware Graphics <linux-graphics-maintainer@xxxxxxxxxx>, Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-efi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <695a3bf6-5382-68df-3ab5-8841b777fca2@linux.intel.com>
References: <20210928191009.32551-1-bp@alien8.de> <80593893-c63b-d481-45f1-42a3a6fd762a@linux.intel.com> <YVN7vPE/7jecXcJ/@zn.tnic> <7319b756-55dc-c4d1-baf6-4686f0156ac4@linux.intel.com> <YVOB3mFV1Kj3MXAs@zn.tnic> <695a3bf6-5382-68df-3ab5-8841b777fca2@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 02:01:57PM -0700, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> Yes. But, since the check is related to TDX, I just want to confirm whether
> you are fine with naming the function as intel_*().

Why is this such a big of a deal?!

There's amd_cc_platform_has() and intel_cc_platform_has() will be the
corresponding Intel version.

> Since this patch is going to have dependency on TDX code, I will include
> this patch in TDX patch set.

Ok.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

References:
- [PATCH v4 0/8] Implement generic cc_platform_has() helper function
  - From: Borislav Petkov
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Implement generic cc_platform_has() helper function
  - From: Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Implement generic cc_platform_has() helper function
  - From: Borislav Petkov
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Implement generic cc_platform_has() helper function
  - From: Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Implement generic cc_platform_has() helper function
  - From: Borislav Petkov
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Implement generic cc_platform_has() helper function
  - From: Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Implement generic cc_platform_has() helper function
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] of, numa: Fetch empty NUMA node ID from distance map
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Implement generic cc_platform_has() helper function
Next by thread: Can EFI memory descriptors overlap?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [ECOS] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]