Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] mm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 11:59:28AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> The mem_encrypt_active() function has been replaced by prot_guest_has(),
> so remove the implementation.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/mem_encrypt.h | 4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h b/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h
> index 5c4a18a91f89..ae4526389261 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h
> @@ -16,10 +16,6 @@
>  
>  #include <asm/mem_encrypt.h>
>  
> -#else	/* !CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT */
> -
> -static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void) { return false; }
> -
>  #endif	/* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT */
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT
> -- 

This one wants to be part of the previous patch.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux