Hello Thomas, On 7/20/21 8:38 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Am 20.07.21 um 15:59 schrieb Daniel Vetter: >> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 03:42:45PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >>> On 7/20/21 3:01 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 09:10:52AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 04:59, Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: [snip] >>>>>> Can we just merge via drm-misc and make sure the acks are present and >>>>>> I'll deal with the fallout if any. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Fine with me. Could you stick it on a separate branch so I can double >>>>> check whether there are any issues wrt the EFI tree? >>>> >>>> It'll pop up in linux-next for integration testing or you can pick up the >>>> patch here for test-merge if you want. >>>> This is what Daniel said... >>> >>> Thanks a lot Dave and Daniel! >> >> Oh I haven't merged them, I'm assuming Thomas will do that. Just figured > > Can I simply put the patches in to drm-misc-next? There was some talk > about a topic branch? > ... which AFAIU means that there's no need for a topic branch, since the patches will be present in linux-next. And the EFI folks can use that to check if there are any integration issues or regressions caused by these. > Best regards > Thomas > Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Linux Engineering Red Hat
