Commit 494c704f9af0 ("efi: Use 32-bit alignment for efi_guid_t") updated
the type definition of efi_guid_t to ensure that it always appears
sufficiently aligned (the UEFI spec is ambiguous about this, but given
the fact that its EFI_GUID type is defined in terms of a struct carrying
a uint32_t, the natural alignment is definitely >= 32 bits).
However, we missed the EFI_GUID() macro which is used to instantiate
efi_guid_t literals: that macro is still based on the guid_t type,
which does not have a minimum alignment at all. This results in warnings
such as
In file included from drivers/firmware/efi/mokvar-table.c:35:
include/linux/efi.h:1093:34: warning: passing 1-byte aligned argument to
4-byte aligned parameter 2 of 'get_var' may result in an unaligned pointer
access [-Walign-mismatch]
status = get_var(L"SecureBoot", &EFI_GLOBAL_VARIABLE_GUID, NULL, &size,
^
include/linux/efi.h:1101:24: warning: passing 1-byte aligned argument to
4-byte aligned parameter 2 of 'get_var' may result in an unaligned pointer
access [-Walign-mismatch]
get_var(L"SetupMode", &EFI_GLOBAL_VARIABLE_GUID, NULL, &size, &setupmode);
The distinction only matters on CPUs that do not support misaligned loads
fully, but 32-bit ARM's load-multiple instructions fall into that category,
and these are likely to be emitted by the compiler that built the firmware
for loading word-aligned 128-bit GUIDs from memory
Instead of bodging this further, let's simply switch to our own definition
of efi_guid_t that carries a uint32_t as well. Since efi_guid_t is used as
an opaque type everywhere in the EFI code, this is only a minor code change.
Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
I am currently testing this change via my for-kernelci branch. Please give
this some soak time in the other CIs that we have access to.
include/linux/efi.h | 15 ++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/efi.h b/include/linux/efi.h
index 8710f5710c1d..f39e9ec7485f 100644
--- a/include/linux/efi.h
+++ b/include/linux/efi.h
@@ -63,17 +63,22 @@ typedef void *efi_handle_t;
* is 32 bits not 8 bits like our guid_t. In some cases (i.e., on 32-bit ARM),
* this means that firmware services invoked by the kernel may assume that
* efi_guid_t* arguments are 32-bit aligned, and use memory accessors that
- * do not tolerate misalignment. So let's set the minimum alignment to 32 bits.
+ * do not tolerate misalignment.
*
* Note that the UEFI spec as well as some comments in the EDK2 code base
* suggest that EFI_GUID should be 64-bit aligned, but this appears to be
* a mistake, given that no code seems to exist that actually enforces that
* or relies on it.
*/
-typedef guid_t efi_guid_t __aligned(__alignof__(u32));
+typedef struct {
+ u32 a;
+ u16 b;
+ u16 c;
+ u8 d[8];
+} efi_guid_t;
#define EFI_GUID(a,b,c,d0,d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7) \
- GUID_INIT(a, b, c, d0, d1, d2, d3, d4, d5, d6, d7)
+ (efi_guid_t){ a, b, c, { d0,d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7 }}
/*
* Generic EFI table header
@@ -598,8 +603,8 @@ efi_guidcmp (efi_guid_t left, efi_guid_t right)
static inline char *
efi_guid_to_str(efi_guid_t *guid, char *out)
{
- sprintf(out, "%pUl", guid->b);
- return out;
+ sprintf(out, "%pUl", guid);
+ return out;
}
extern void efi_init (void);
--
2.30.1
