On Thu, 4 Feb 2021 at 09:39, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Ard! > > On 2/4/21 9:33 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > That is one aspect of it. Another aspect is that the lack of a > > asm/efi.h header created some problems in the past, given that all > > other EFI architectures do have it. > > > > But the most important reason is really that arch-specific definitions > > for an obsolete architecture should not be visible in other builds. > > I fully agree. I try to test your patches over the weekend. Since Tony > is not active anymore, we need to get the patches pulled in through > someone else's tree. Probably Arnd or Mike (both CC'ed). > Actually, I have already sent this patch via the EFI tree, and it is already in -next.
