> Why is that? Both .text and .text.hot have alignment of 2^4 (default > function alignment on x86) by default, so it doesn't seem like it should > matter for packing density. Avoiding interspersing cold text among You may lose part of a cache line on each unit boundary. Linux has a lot of units, some of them small. All these bytes add up. It's bad for TLB locality too. Sadly with all the fine grained protection changes the 2MB coverage is eroding anyways, but this makes it even worse. > regular/hot text seems like it should be a net win. > > That old commit doesn't reference efficiency -- it says there was some > problem with matching when they were separated out, but there were no > wildcard section names back then. It was about efficiency. -Andi
