On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 at 13:17, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
<b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> [ added EFI Maintainer & ML to Cc: ]
>
> Hi,
>
> On 7/9/20 11:17 AM, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> > On 28.06.20 10:50, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> >> Ping?
> >>
> >> On 10.06.20 16:10, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >>> efifb_probe() will issue an error message in case the kernel is booted
> >>> as Xen dom0 from UEFI as EFI_MEMMAP won't be set in this case. Avoid
> >>> that message by calling efi_mem_desc_lookup() only if EFI_PARAVIRT
> >>> isn't set.
> >>>
Why not test for EFI_MEMMAP instead of EFI_BOOT?
> >>> Fixes: 38ac0287b7f4 ("fbdev/efifb: Honour UEFI memory map attributes when mapping the FB")
> >>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c | 2 +-
> >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c
> >>> index 65491ae74808..f5eccd1373e9 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c
> >>> @@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ static int efifb_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
> >>> info->apertures->ranges[0].base = efifb_fix.smem_start;
> >>> info->apertures->ranges[0].size = size_remap;
> >>> - if (efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT) &&
> >>> + if (efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT) && !efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT) &&
> >>> !efi_mem_desc_lookup(efifb_fix.smem_start, &md)) {
> >>> if ((efifb_fix.smem_start + efifb_fix.smem_len) >
> >>> (md.phys_addr + (md.num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT))) {
> >>>
> >>
> >
> > In case I see no reaction from the maintainer for another week I'll take
> > this patch through the Xen tree.
>
> From fbdev POV this change looks fine to me and I'm OK with merging it
> through Xen or EFI tree:
>
> Acked-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
> Samsung Electronics
