On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 23:43, Arvind Sankar <nivedita@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 08:49:21PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 20:47, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 2020-04-29 at 13:41 -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote: > > > > Use pr_efi_err instead of bare efi_printk for error messages. > > > > > > Perhaps it'd be better to rename pr_efi_err to eri_err > > > to it's clearer it's a typical efi_ logging function. > > > > > > $ git grep -w --name-only pr_efi_err | \ > > > xargs sed -i 's/\bpr_efi_err\b/efi_err/g' > > > > > > > Yeah, pr_efi_err() is probably not the best name > > Should I rename pr_efi/pr_efi_err to, say, efi_pr_info/efi_pr_error? If you don't mind spinning another couple of patches, yes, that would be helpful. Let's use efi_pr_info and efi_pr_err to stay aligned with the ordinary counterparts