Re: [v2 PATCH 1/5] efi: Move arm-stub to a common file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 at 11:48, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 4/21/20 9:19 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:29:03 PDT (-0700), Atish Patra wrote:
> >> Most of the arm-stub code is written in an architecture independent
> >> manner.
> >> As a result, RISC-V can reuse most of the arm-stub code.
> >>
> >> Rename the arm-stub.c to efi-stub.c so that ARM, ARM64 and RISC-V can
> >> use it.
> >> This patch doesn't introduce any functional changes.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@xxxxxxx>
>
> The code being moved has some problems:
>
> The ARM stub ignores the return value of efi_setup_gop().
>
> drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.c and
> drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c both call LocateHandle() before
> calling efi_setup_gop(). I think this should be moved to efi_setup_gop().
>
> I guess the issues can be addressed in some follow up patch.
>

Yes, I suppose this could be improved a bit, so patches welcome, as usual :-)
But I don't think it has any bearing on a patch that renames the file.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux