On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 09:32:47AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> The EFI handover protocol strikes again :-(
>
> It seems we did not include any guidance in the documentation in
> Documentation/x86/boot.rst regarding zero-initializing BSS, and come
> to think of it, we don't include any other requirements either, i.e.,
> regarding placement wrt section alignment etc. This is a serious bug.
> Even though EFI usually lays out PE/COFF images in files the exact way
> they appear in memory, this is not actually required by the spec. Most
> notably, the virtual size can be smaller than the file size, and the
> loader is expected to zero-initialize the difference as well.
Is that expectation stated explicitly somewhere?
> Since the EFI handover protocol should be considered deprecated at
> this point (and is never going to be supported in upstream GRUB
> either, for instance), I would recommend the systemd-boot developers
> to start looking into deprecating this as well, and switch to the
> ordinary PE/COFF entry point, and use the new initrd callback protocol
> for initrd loading.
Any pointers to that new initrd callback protocol?
In any case, I'd really appreciate a patch to boot.rst formulating those
requirements so that they're written down and people can find them.
> On the Linux/x86 side, we should at least add some code to the EFI
> handover protocol entry point to zero initialize BSS, and ensure that
> it is either not needed in other places, or add the code to deal with
> those as well.
Sounds like a simple fix, if that would fix it.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
