On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 10:51:01PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 at 20:54, Arvind Sankar <nivedita@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > You're *sure* the after is actually after? There seems to be no change > > at all, the patch should have had some effect. > > Duh. > > Yes, you are right. It was 'operator error' Phew! Thanks for the test :)
