On 07/05/2019 02:05 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Hi Nayna,
Hi Michael, Oliver,
Nayna Jain <nayna@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
As part of PowerNV secure boot support, OS verification keys are stored
and controlled by OPAL as secure variables. These need to be exposed to
the userspace so that sysadmins can perform key management tasks.
This patch adds the support to expose secure variables via a sysfs
interface It reuses the the existing efi defined hooks and backend in
order to maintain the compatibility with the userspace tools.
Which tools? Can you include a log demonstrating how they're used, ie.
so that I can test the sequence of commands.
Though it reuses a great deal of efi, POWER platforms do not use EFI.
A new config, POWER_SECVAR_SYSFS, is defined to enable this new sysfs
interface.
Sorry I haven't been able to keep up with all the discussions, but I
thought the consensus was that pretending to be EFI-like was a bad idea,
because we don't have actual EFI and we're not implementing an entirely
compatible scheme to EFI anyway.
Greg suggested just putting the variables in sysfs, why does that not
work? Matthew mentioned "complex semantics around variable deletion and
immutability" but do we have to emulate those semantics on powerpc?
Sorry for the delay in the response.
Yes, I agree. The purpose of the v2 version of the patchset was to try
and quickly address Matthew's concerns. This version of the patchset:
* is not using any EFI configs
* is not exposing secure variables via efivarfs
* is based on Greg's suggestion to use sysfs
* is STILL using some of the existing EFI code, that is used by EFI to
expose its variables via sysfs, to avoid code duplication.
* is using efivar hooks to expose secure variables for tool compatibility
Assuming we all are in agreement, the next version of this patchset will
further improve upon these changes. It will refactor some of the sysfs
code from drivers/firmware/efi that is common to both EFI and POWER.
Since we do not have to emulate the complex semantics of efi on powerpc,
the sysfs interface should work for us.
As per the tool, it will be efivar. I will provide the log demonstrating
how it is used with the next version.
Is there something I missed in my understanding ?
Thanks & Regards,
- Nayna
