Hi Nayna, >> I guess I also somewhat object to calling it a 'backend' if we're using >> it as a version scheme. I think the skiboot storage backends are true >> backends - they provide different implementations of the same >> functionality with the same API, but this seems like you're using it to >> indicate different functionality. It seems like we're using it as if it >> were called OPAL_SECVAR_VERSION. > > We are changing how we are exposing the version to the kernel. The > version will be exposed as device-tree entry rather than a OPAL runtime > service. We are not tied to the name "backend", we can switch to calling > it as "scheme" unless there is a better name. This sounds like a good approach to me. Kind regards, Daniel > > Thanks & Regards, > - Nayna
