On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 12:16 PM Ard Biesheuvel
<ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 11:09, Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Commit a893ea15d764 ("tpm: move tpm_chip definition to
> > include/linux/tpm.h") introduced a build error when both ima and efi is
> > enabled. What happens is that both headers (ima.h and efi.h) defines the
> > same 'NONE' constant, and it broke when they started getting included
> > from the same file.
> I'd argue that we should apply both patches. 'NONE' is far too
> generic, so it requires a subsystem prefix if it has a special meaning
> inside a subsystem.
I was about to say the same thing.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
