On 11/29/2018 09:37 PM, Dave Young wrote:
> + more people
>
> On 11/29/18 at 04:09pm, Lianbo Jiang wrote:
>> When doing kexec_file_load, the first kernel needs to pass the e820
>> reserved ranges to the second kernel. But kernel can not exactly
>> match the e820 reserved ranges when walking through the iomem resources
>> with the descriptor 'IORES_DESC_NONE', because several e820 types(
>> e.g. E820_TYPE_RESERVED_KERN/E820_TYPE_RAM/E820_TYPE_UNUSABLE/E820
>> _TYPE_RESERVED) are converted to the descriptor 'IORES_DESC_NONE'. It
>> may pass these four types to the kdump kernel, that is not desired result.
>>
>> So, this patch adds a new I/O resource descriptor 'IORES_DESC_RESERVED'
>> for the iomem resources search interfaces. It is helpful to exactly
>> match the reserved resource ranges when walking through iomem resources.
>>
>> In addition, since the new descriptor 'IORES_DESC_RESERVED' is introduced,
>> these code originally related to the descriptor 'IORES_DESC_NONE' need to
>> be updated. Otherwise, it will be easily confused and also cause some
>> errors. Because the 'E820_TYPE_RESERVED' type is converted to the new
>> descriptor 'IORES_DESC_RESERVED' instead of 'IORES_DESC_NONE', it has been
>> changed.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Dave Young <dyoung@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/ia64/kernel/efi.c | 4 ++++
>> arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 2 +-
>> arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
>> include/linux/ioport.h | 1 +
>> kernel/resource.c | 6 +++---
>> 5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/efi.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/efi.c
>> index 8f106638913c..1841e9b4db30 100644
>> --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/efi.c
>> +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/efi.c
>> @@ -1231,6 +1231,10 @@ efi_initialize_iomem_resources(struct resource *code_resource,
>> break;
>>
>> case EFI_RESERVED_TYPE:
>> + name = "reserved";
>
> Ingo updated X86 code to use "Reserved", I think it would be good to do
> same for this case as well
>
>> + desc = IORES_DESC_RESERVED;
>> + break;
>> +
>> case EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE:
>> case EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA:
>> case EFI_ACPI_RECLAIM_MEMORY:
>
> Originally, above 3 are all "reserved", so probably they all should be
> IORES_DESC_RESERVED.
>
> Can any IA64 people to review this?
>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
>> index 50895c2f937d..57fafdafb860 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
>> @@ -1048,10 +1048,10 @@ static unsigned long __init e820_type_to_iores_desc(struct e820_entry *entry)
>> case E820_TYPE_NVS: return IORES_DESC_ACPI_NV_STORAGE;
>> case E820_TYPE_PMEM: return IORES_DESC_PERSISTENT_MEMORY;
>> case E820_TYPE_PRAM: return IORES_DESC_PERSISTENT_MEMORY_LEGACY;
>> + case E820_TYPE_RESERVED: return IORES_DESC_RESERVED;
>> case E820_TYPE_RESERVED_KERN: /* Fall-through: */
>> case E820_TYPE_RAM: /* Fall-through: */
>> case E820_TYPE_UNUSABLE: /* Fall-through: */
>> - case E820_TYPE_RESERVED: /* Fall-through: */
>> default: return IORES_DESC_NONE;
>> }
>> }
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
>> index 5378d10f1d31..fea2ef99415d 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
>> @@ -83,7 +83,18 @@ static bool __ioremap_check_ram(struct resource *res)
>>
>> static int __ioremap_check_desc_other(struct resource *res)
>> {
>> - return (res->desc != IORES_DESC_NONE);
>> + /*
>> + * But now, the 'E820_TYPE_RESERVED' type is converted to the new
>> + * descriptor 'IORES_DESC_RESERVED' instead of 'IORES_DESC_NONE',
>> + * it has been changed. And the value of 'mem_flags.desc_other'
>> + * is equal to 'true' if we don't strengthen the condition in this
>> + * function, that is wrong. Because originally it is equal to
>> + * 'false' for the same reserved type.
>> + *
>> + * So, that would be nice to keep it the same as before.
>> + */
>> + return ((res->desc != IORES_DESC_NONE) &&
>> + (res->desc != IORES_DESC_RESERVED));
>> }
>
> Added Tom since he added the check function. Is it possible to only
> check explict valid desc types instead of exclude IORES_DESC_NONE?
Sorry for the delay...
The original intent of the check was to map most memory as encrypted under
SEV if it was marked with a specific descriptor, since it was likely to
not be MMIO. I tried converting most things that mapped memory to memremap
vs ioremap, but ACPI was one area that I left alone and this check catches
the mapping of the ACPI tables. I suppose it's possible to change this to
check just for IORES_DESC_ACPI_* values, but I would have to do some
testing.
Thanks,
Tom
>
>>
>> static int __ioremap_res_check(struct resource *res, void *arg)
>> diff --git a/include/linux/ioport.h b/include/linux/ioport.h
>> index da0ebaec25f0..6ed59de48bd5 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/ioport.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/ioport.h
>> @@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ enum {
>> IORES_DESC_PERSISTENT_MEMORY_LEGACY = 5,
>> IORES_DESC_DEVICE_PRIVATE_MEMORY = 6,
>> IORES_DESC_DEVICE_PUBLIC_MEMORY = 7,
>> + IORES_DESC_RESERVED = 8,
>> };
>>
>> /* helpers to define resources */
>> diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
>> index b0fbf685c77a..f34a632c4169 100644
>> --- a/kernel/resource.c
>> +++ b/kernel/resource.c
>> @@ -994,7 +994,7 @@ __reserve_region_with_split(struct resource *root, resource_size_t start,
>> res->start = start;
>> res->end = end;
>> res->flags = type | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
>> - res->desc = IORES_DESC_NONE;
>> + res->desc = IORES_DESC_RESERVED;
>>
>> while (1) {
>>
>> @@ -1029,7 +1029,7 @@ __reserve_region_with_split(struct resource *root, resource_size_t start,
>> next_res->start = conflict->end + 1;
>> next_res->end = end;
>> next_res->flags = type | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
>> - next_res->desc = IORES_DESC_NONE;
>> + next_res->desc = IORES_DESC_RESERVED;
>> }
>> } else {
>> res->start = conflict->end + 1;
>> @@ -1477,7 +1477,7 @@ static int __init reserve_setup(char *str)
>> res->start = io_start;
>> res->end = io_start + io_num - 1;
>> res->flags |= IORESOURCE_BUSY;
>> - res->desc = IORES_DESC_NONE;
>> + res->desc = IORES_DESC_RESERVED;
>> res->child = NULL;
>> if (request_resource(parent, res) == 0)
>> reserved = x+1;
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
>
>
> There are a lot of places call region_intersects which use DESC_NONE,
> I'm not sure if needed changes accordingly. Cced Dan and Toshi.
>
>
> Thanks
> Dave
>
