On 10/10/18 at 11:19am, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 11:14:26AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Yes, it's different, but if the SRAT information is available early, then > > the command line parameter can go away because then the required > > information for Masa's problem is available as well. > > Exactly. And I'd prefer we delayed the command line parameter until we > figure out we really need it and not expose it to upstream and then > remove it shortly after. > > So I'd suggest we move Masa's patches to a separate branch and not send > it up this round. Yes, sounds more reasonable if we can reuse functions in Chao's patch 1/3 to solve the padding issue. Thanks Baoquan
