Re: [PATCH 5/8] efi: Decode IA32/X64 Cache, TLB, and Bus Check structures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 23 February 2018 at 20:03, Yazen Ghannam <Yazen.Ghannam@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@xxxxxxx>
>
> Print the common fields of the Cache, TLB, and Bus check structures.The
> fields of these three check types are the same except for a few more
> fields in the Bus check structure. The remaining Bus check structure
> fields will be decoded in a following patch.
>
> Based on UEFI 2.7,
> Table 257. IA32/X64 Cache Check Structure
> Table 258. IA32/X64 TLB Check Structure
> Table 259. IA32/X64 Bus Check Structure
>
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 4.16.x
> Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/efi/cper-x86.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 100 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper-x86.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper-x86.c
> index 3b86223bdb67..75f664043076 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper-x86.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper-x86.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,25 @@
>  #define INFO_VALID_RESPONDER_ID                BIT_ULL(3)
>  #define INFO_VALID_IP                  BIT_ULL(4)
>
> +#define CHECK_VALID_TRANS_TYPE         BIT_ULL(0)
> +#define CHECK_VALID_OPERATION          BIT_ULL(1)
> +#define CHECK_VALID_LEVEL              BIT_ULL(2)
> +#define CHECK_VALID_PCC                        BIT_ULL(3)
> +#define CHECK_VALID_UNCORRECTED                BIT_ULL(4)
> +#define CHECK_VALID_PRECISE_IP         BIT_ULL(5)
> +#define CHECK_VALID_RESTARTABLE_IP     BIT_ULL(6)
> +#define CHECK_VALID_OVERFLOW           BIT_ULL(7)
> +
> +#define CHECK_VALID_BITS(check)                ((check & GENMASK_ULL(15, 0)))
> +#define CHECK_TRANS_TYPE(check)                ((check & GENMASK_ULL(17, 16)) >> 16)
> +#define CHECK_OPERATION(check)         ((check & GENMASK_ULL(21, 18)) >> 18)
> +#define CHECK_LEVEL(check)             ((check & GENMASK_ULL(24, 22)) >> 22)

Parens around 'check' please

> +#define CHECK_PCC                      BIT_ULL(25)
> +#define CHECK_UNCORRECTED              BIT_ULL(26)
> +#define CHECK_PRECISE_IP               BIT_ULL(27)
> +#define CHECK_RESTARTABLE_IP           BIT_ULL(28)
> +#define CHECK_OVERFLOW                 BIT_ULL(29)
> +
>  enum err_types {
>         ERR_TYPE_CACHE = 0,
>         ERR_TYPE_TLB,
> @@ -55,11 +74,83 @@ static enum err_types cper_get_err_type(const guid_t *err_type)
>                 return N_ERR_TYPES;
>  }
>
> +static const char * const ia_check_trans_type_strs[] = {
> +       "Instruction",
> +       "Data Access",
> +       "Generic",
> +};
> +
> +static const char * const ia_check_op_strs[] = {
> +       "generic error",
> +       "generic read",
> +       "generic write",
> +       "data read",
> +       "data write",
> +       "instruction fetch",
> +       "prefetch",
> +       "eviction",
> +       "snoop",
> +};
> +
> +static inline void print_bool(char *str, const char *pfx, u64 check, u64 bit)
> +{
> +       printk("%s%s: %s\n", pfx, str, (check & bit) ? "true" : "false");
> +}
> +
> +static void print_err_info(const char *pfx, enum err_types err_type, u64 check)

u8 for err_type please

> +{
> +       u16 validation_bits = CHECK_VALID_BITS(check);
> +
> +       printk("%sValidation Bits: 0x%04x\n", pfx, validation_bits);
> +
> +       if (err_type == ERR_TYPE_MS)
> +               return;
> +
> +       if (validation_bits & CHECK_VALID_TRANS_TYPE) {
> +               u8 trans_type = CHECK_TRANS_TYPE(check);
> +
> +               printk("%sTransaction Type: %u, %s\n", pfx, trans_type,
> +                        trans_type < ARRAY_SIZE(ia_check_trans_type_strs) ?
> +                        ia_check_trans_type_strs[trans_type] : "unknown");
> +       }
> +
> +       if (validation_bits & CHECK_VALID_OPERATION) {
> +               u8 op = CHECK_OPERATION(check);
> +
> +               /*
> +                * CACHE has more operation types than TLB or BUS, though the
> +                * name and the order are the same.
> +                */
> +               u8 max_ops = (err_type == ERR_TYPE_CACHE) ? 9 : 7;
> +
> +               printk("%sOperation: %u, %s\n", pfx, op,
> +                        op < max_ops ? ia_check_op_strs[op] : "unknown");
> +       }
> +
> +       if (validation_bits & CHECK_VALID_LEVEL)
> +               printk("%sLevel: %llu\n", pfx, CHECK_LEVEL(check));
> +
> +       if (validation_bits & CHECK_VALID_PCC)
> +               print_bool("Processor Context Corrupt", pfx, check, CHECK_PCC);
> +
> +       if (validation_bits & CHECK_VALID_UNCORRECTED)
> +               print_bool("Uncorrected", pfx, check, CHECK_UNCORRECTED);
> +
> +       if (validation_bits & CHECK_VALID_PRECISE_IP)
> +               print_bool("Precise IP", pfx, check, CHECK_PRECISE_IP);
> +
> +       if (validation_bits & CHECK_VALID_RESTARTABLE_IP)
> +               print_bool("Restartable IP", pfx, check, CHECK_RESTARTABLE_IP);
> +
> +       if (validation_bits & CHECK_VALID_OVERFLOW)
> +               print_bool("Overflow", pfx, check, CHECK_OVERFLOW);
> +}
> +
>  void cper_print_proc_ia(const char *pfx, const struct cper_sec_proc_ia *proc)
>  {
>         int i;
>         struct cper_ia_err_info *err_info;
> -       char newpfx[64];
> +       char newpfx[64], infopfx[64];
>         enum err_types err_type;
>
>         printk("%sValidation Bits: 0x%016llx\n", pfx, proc->validation_bits);
> @@ -93,6 +184,14 @@ void cper_print_proc_ia(const char *pfx, const struct cper_sec_proc_ia *proc)
>                 if (err_info->validation_bits & INFO_VALID_CHECK_INFO) {
>                         printk("%sCheck Information: 0x%016llx\n", newpfx,
>                                  err_info->check_info);
> +
> +                       if (err_type < N_ERR_TYPES) {
> +                               snprintf(infopfx, sizeof(infopfx), "%s%s",
> +                                        newpfx, INDENT_SP);
> +
> +                               print_err_info(infopfx, err_type,
> +                                              err_info->check_info);
> +                       }
>                 }
>
>                 if (err_info->validation_bits & INFO_VALID_TARGET_ID) {
> --
> 2.14.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux