> -----Original Message----- > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2017 4:27 PM > To: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Ghannam, Yazen > <Yazen.Ghannam@xxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Matt Fleming > <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>; Andrew > Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Andy Lutomirski > <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>; Ard Biesheuvel > <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>; Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>; Brian Gerst > <brgerst@xxxxxxxxx>; Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Denys > Vlasenko <dvlasenk@xxxxxxxxxx>; H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>; Linus > Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Peter Zijlstra > <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sai Praneeth Prakhya > <sai.praneeth.prakhya@xxxxxxxxx>; Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; > Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxx>; > linux-efi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>; Ghannam, > Yazen <Yazen.Ghannam@xxxxxxx>; Alex Thorlton <athorlton@xxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 05/27] x86/efi: Build our own page table structures > > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 10:43:49PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 16:59 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me > know. > > > > > > ------------------ > > > > > > From: Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > commit 67a9108ed4313b85a9c53406d80dc1ae3f8c3e36 upstream. > > [...] > > > > It looks like this will cause regressions unless you also apply: > > > > 21cdb6b56843 x86/mm: Page align the '_end' symbol to avoid pfn > conversion bugs > > b61a76f8850d x86/efi: Map RAM into the identity page table for mixed > mode > > 753b11ef8e92 x86/efi: Setup separate EFI page tables in kexec paths > > > > and possibly also: > > > > 08914f436bdd x86/platform/UV: Bring back the call to map_low_mmrs in > uv_system_init > > 683ad8092cd2 x86/efi: Fix 7-parameter efi_call()s > > 80e75596079f efi: Convert efi_call_virt() to efi_call_virt_pointer() > > d1be84a232e3 x86/uv: Update uv_bios_call() to use efi_call_virt_pointer() > > Ugh, that's a mess. Yazen is the one who reported this patch, and 2 > others, were needed to resolve an issue on their hardware. > > Yazen, any thoughts here? Should I just revert the 3 patches, or do you > also feel I need all 7 of these to ensure everything works properly? > I think it's okay to revert the 3 patches. Thanks, Yazen -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
