Hello David,
David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> +static struct sysrq_key_op lockdown_lift_sysrq_op = {
> + .handler = sysrq_handle_lockdown_lift,
> + .help_msg = "unSB(x)",
> + .action_msg = "Disabling Secure Boot restrictions",
> + .enable_mask = SYSRQ_DISABLE_USERSPACE,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init lockdown_lift_sysrq(void)
> +{
> + if (kernel_locked_down) {
> + lockdown_lift_sysrq_op.help_msg[5] = LOCKDOWN_LIFT_KEY;
> + register_sysrq_key(LOCKDOWN_LIFT_KEY, &lockdown_lift_sysrq_op);
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +late_initcall(lockdown_lift_sysrq);
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ALLOW_LOCKDOWN_LIFT_BY_KEY */
On non-x86 platforms (tested on powerpc) this fails to build with:
security/lock_down.c: In function ‘lockdown_lift_sysrq’:
security/lock_down.c:100:40: error: ‘LOCKDOWN_LIFT_KEY’ undeclared (first use in this function)
lockdown_lift_sysrq_op.help_msg[5] = LOCKDOWN_LIFT_KEY;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
security/lock_down.c:100:40: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
--
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
