Hi Ard,
I have one comment inclined.
在 3/22/2017 11:30 PM, Ard Biesheuvel 写道:
On UEFI systems, the PCI subsystem is enumerated by the firmware,
and if a graphical framebuffer is exposed by a PCI device, its base
address and size are exposed to the OS via the Graphics Output
Protocol (GOP).
On arm64 PCI systems, the entire PCI hierarchy is reconfigured from
scratch at boot. This may result in the GOP framebuffer address to
become stale, if the BAR covering the framebuffer is modified. This
will cause the framebuffer to become unresponsive, and may in some
cases result in unpredictable behavior if the range is reassigned to
another device.
So add a quirk to the EFI fb driver to find the BAR associated with
the GOP base address, and set the IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED attribute so
that the PCI core will leave it alone.
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Jones <pjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
v3: check device is enabled before attempting to claim the resource
drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c
index 8c4dc1e1f94f..88f653864a01 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include <linux/efi.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/fb.h>
+#include <linux/pci.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/screen_info.h>
#include <video/vga.h>
@@ -143,6 +144,9 @@ static struct attribute *efifb_attrs[] = {
};
ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(efifb);
+static bool pci_bar_found; /* did we find a BAR matching the efifb base? */
+static bool pci_dev_disabled; /* was the device disabled? */
+
static int efifb_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
{
struct fb_info *info;
@@ -152,7 +156,7 @@ static int efifb_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
unsigned int size_total;
char *option = NULL;
- if (screen_info.orig_video_isVGA != VIDEO_TYPE_EFI)
+ if (screen_info.orig_video_isVGA != VIDEO_TYPE_EFI || pci_dev_disabled)
return -ENODEV;
if (fb_get_options("efifb", &option))
@@ -360,3 +364,57 @@ static struct platform_driver efifb_driver = {
};
builtin_platform_driver(efifb_driver);
+
+static void claim_efifb_bar(struct pci_dev *dev, int idx)
+{
+ u16 word;
+
+ pci_bar_found = true;
+
+ pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &word);
+ if (!(word & PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY)) {
+ pci_dev_disabled = true;
+ dev_err(&dev->dev,
+ "BAR %d: assigned to efifb but device is disabled!\n",
+ idx);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (pci_claim_resource(dev, idx)) {
+ pci_dev_disabled = true;
+ dev_err(&dev->dev,
+ "BAR %d: failed to claim resource for efifb!\n", idx);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ dev_info(&dev->dev, "BAR %d: assigned to efifb\n", idx);
+}
+
+static void efifb_fixup_resources(struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
+ u64 base = screen_info.lfb_base;
+ u64 size = screen_info.lfb_size;
+ int i;
+
+ if (pci_bar_found || screen_info.orig_video_isVGA != VIDEO_TYPE_EFI)
+ return;
+
+ if (screen_info.capabilities & VIDEO_CAPABILITY_64BIT_BASE)
+ base |= (u64)screen_info.ext_lfb_base << 32;
+
+ if (!base)
+ return;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END; i++) {
+ struct resource *res = &dev->resource[i];
+
+ if (!(res->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM))
+ continue;
+
+ if (res->start <= base && res->end >= base + size - 1) {
Have we considered PCI address translation here? I suppose the address
reported by EFI GOP should be the address of CPU domain, not address of
PCI domain. Address read from PCI BAR is PCI address which should add
translation offset before being compared to CPU domain address.
I've not familiar with Linux code, so please ignore my comment if the
code has supported address translation.
Regards,
Gary (Heyi Guo)
+ claim_efifb_bar(dev, i);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+}
+DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, efifb_fixup_resources);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
