On Tue, 31 Jan, at 03:13:49PM, David Howells wrote: > diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c > index f99978db6b6f..57c2c9c71e53 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c > +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c > @@ -988,6 +988,12 @@ struct boot_params *efi_main(struct efi_config *c, > else > setup_boot_services32(efi_early); > > + /* If the boot loader gave us a value for secure_boot then we use that, > + * otherwise we ask the BIOS. > + */ > + if (boot_params->secure_boot == efi_secureboot_mode_unset) > + boot_params->secure_boot = efi_get_secureboot(sys_table); > + > setup_graphics(boot_params); > > setup_efi_pci(boot_params); It's not a big deal, but this multi-line comment format isn't correct. Either Ard or I will fix it up when applying this patch. Same goes for the comment in patch 5. Otherwise this patch looks fine. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
