Matt, On 31 January 2017 at 18:04, kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi David, > > [auto build test ERROR on efi/next] > [also build test ERROR on v4.10-rc6 next-20170130] > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/David-Howells/efi-Pass-secure-boot-mode-to-kernel-ver-7/20170131-232202 > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mfleming/efi.git next This is the wrong repo ^^^ I am not sure if there is anything we can do about this, but perhaps you should simply remove it now that we've migrated to the new repo. > config: arm64-defconfig (attached as .config) > compiler: aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705 > reproduce: > wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > make.cross ARCH=arm64 > > All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > In file included from drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/secureboot.c:15:0: > drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/secureboot.c: In function 'efi_get_secureboot': >>> arch/arm64/include/asm/efi.h:52:34: error: called object is not a function or function pointer > #define efi_call_runtime(f, ...) sys_table_arg->runtime->f(__VA_ARGS__) > ^ >>> drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/secureboot.c:27:2: note: in expansion of macro 'efi_call_runtime' > efi_call_runtime(get_variable, \ > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>> drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/secureboot.c:41:11: note: in expansion of macro 'get_efi_var' > status = get_efi_var(efi_SecureBoot_name, &efi_variable_guid, > ^~~~~~~~~~~ >>> arch/arm64/include/asm/efi.h:52:34: error: called object is not a function or function pointer > #define efi_call_runtime(f, ...) sys_table_arg->runtime->f(__VA_ARGS__) > ^ >>> drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/secureboot.c:27:2: note: in expansion of macro 'efi_call_runtime' > efi_call_runtime(get_variable, \ > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/secureboot.c:47:11: note: in expansion of macro 'get_efi_var' > status = get_efi_var(efi_SetupMode_name, &efi_variable_guid, > ^~~~~~~~~~~ > > vim +52 arch/arm64/include/asm/efi.h > > a13b00778 Ard Biesheuvel 2014-07-02 46 */ > a13b00778 Ard Biesheuvel 2014-07-02 47 #define EFI_FDT_ALIGN SZ_2M /* used by allocate_new_fdt_and_exit_boot() */ > a13b00778 Ard Biesheuvel 2014-07-02 48 #define MAX_FDT_OFFSET SZ_512M > a13b00778 Ard Biesheuvel 2014-07-02 49 > a13b00778 Ard Biesheuvel 2014-07-02 50 #define efi_call_early(f, ...) sys_table_arg->boottime->f(__VA_ARGS__) > fc3720642 Ard Biesheuvel 2016-04-25 51 #define __efi_call_early(f, ...) f(__VA_ARGS__) > 2fb88d885 David Howells 2017-01-31 @52 #define efi_call_runtime(f, ...) sys_table_arg->runtime->f(__VA_ARGS__) > fc3720642 Ard Biesheuvel 2016-04-25 53 #define efi_is_64bit() (true) > a13b00778 Ard Biesheuvel 2014-07-02 54 > 3552fdf29 Lukas Wunner 2016-11-12 55 #define efi_call_proto(protocol, f, instance, ...) \ > > :::::: The code at line 52 was first introduced by commit > :::::: 2fb88d8858497455db948de0d2488b35ef2bd874 arm/efi: Allow invocation of arbitrary runtime services [ver #7] > > :::::: TO: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> > :::::: CC: 0day robot <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
