On 01/18/17 at 07:01pm, Dave Young wrote:
> On 01/17/17 at 08:48pm, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 17 2017, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >
> > > On 16 January 2017 at 02:45, Dave Young <dyoung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> efi_mem_reserve cares only about boot services regions, for making sure
> > >> later efi_free_boot_services does not free areas which are still useful,
> > >> such as bgrt image buffer.
> > >>
> > >> So add a new argument to efi_memmap_insert for this purpose.
> > >>
> > >
> > > So what happens is we try to efi_mem_reserve() a regions that is not
> > > bootservices code or data?
> > > We shouldn't simply ignore it, because it is a serious condition.
> >
> > The efi_mem_desc_lookup() call in efi_arch_mem_reserve() wouldn't return
> > anything and the latter would
> >
> > pr_err("Failed to lookup EFI memory descriptor for %pa\n", &addr);
> >
> > then.
> >
> > This is so because efi_mem_desc_lookup() searches only for regions that
> > either
> > - are of type EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA or EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA
> > - or which have EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME set already:
> >
> > if (!(md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME) &&
> > md->type != EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA &&
> > md->type != EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA) {
> > continue;
> > }
> >
> > For EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA and EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME,
> > efi_arch_mem_reserve() would be a nop.
> >
> > So we're fine here? Do you want to have a more descriptive error message
> > than "Failed to lookup EFI memory descriptor"?
> >
> >
> > For the other checks you suggested in that other thread, i.e. for the
> > post-slab_is_available() condition and so: let me wait until Dave's
> > series has stabilized (or even picked) and I'll submit patches for
> > what remains to be sanity checked then.
> >
> > Also, since Dave eliminated the need for late efi_mem_reserve()'s,
> > my 20b1e22d01a4 ("x86/efi: Don't allocate memmap through memblock after
> > mm_init()") should certainly get reverted at some point.
>
> While testing my patches with latest edk2, I found another thing to be
> fixed, I will repost bgrt patch according to Ard's comment tomorrow,
> maybe with below patch as another fix to the memblock_alloc late
> callback.
>
> ---
> arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- linux-x86.orig/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> +++ linux-x86/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> @@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ void __init efi_free_boot_services(void)
> }
>
> new_size = efi.memmap.desc_size * num_entries;
> - new_phys = kzalloc(new_size, GFP_KERNEL);
Oops, it was memblock_alloc(), this is a middle test code used for
debugging. Just ignore it.
> + new_phys = efi_memmap_alloc(num_entries);
Maybe a efi_memmap_late_alloc is enough, will see if I can get a better
version, maybe your previous patch can be dropped partially or just
kept.
> if (!new_phys) {
> pr_err("Failed to allocate new EFI memmap\n");
> return;
>
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Nicolai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
