On Sun, 08 Jan, at 01:24:49AM, Nicolai Stange wrote: > > Out of curiosity, I had a deeper look at the BootServices*-md > requirement though: > > > Another problem is that we never check that the reservation is covered > > by a BootServicesData region, which are the only ones that are > > guaranteed to be retained up to this point. > > I think the "only ones that are guaranteed to be retained" part might > not be completely correct: at least my firmware seems to report only the > EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY, EFI_LOADER_DATA, EFI_LOADER_CODE, > EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_CODE and EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA as E820_RAM > (I think that these mappings are dictated by table 15-330 of ACPI 6.1: > "UEFI Memory Types and mapping to ACPI address range types"). > > This would mean, that memblock_x86_fill() adds only these regions to > memblock.memory. Data required at runtime should only be in EFI_LOADER* regions if it's part of some setup_data object (see things like SETUP_EFI), and subsequently has been memblock_reserve()'d at some point. Nothing valuable should be in EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY because, by definition, it's free memory. > free_all_bootmem() only operates on the (non-highmem) regions given by > memblock.memory and thus, any region of a type different from the ones > listed above would never get freed to the buddy allocator anyway, AFAICS. This is true. > Thus, the only md type where ranges efi_mem_reserve()'d therein aren't > retained are EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY, EFI_LOADER_DATA and > EFI_LOADER_CODE (and possibly highmem). Hopefully, nobody would ever > call efi_mem_reserve() on such a range but that assumption might be > wrong. I would happily welcome some diagnostic checks to ensure we never get silently stung by this. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
