Hello Punit,
Thank you for the feedback! Responses below
On 10/12/2016 9:39 AM, Punit Agrawal wrote:
Hi Tyler,
A few comments below.
Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
A RAS (Reliability, Availability, Serviceability) controller
may be a separate processor running in parallel with OS
execution, and may generate error records for consumption by
the OS. If the RAS controller produces multiple error records,
then they may be overwritten before the OS has consumed them.
The Generic Hardware Error Source (GHES) v2 structure
introduces the capability for the OS to acknowledge the
consumption of the error record generated by the RAS
controller. A RAS controller supporting GHESv2 shall wait for
the acknowledgment before writing a new error record, thus
eliminating the race condition.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Richard Ruigrok <rruigrok@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Naveen Kaje <nkaje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c | 7 +++++--
include/acpi/ghes.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
index 60746ef..3021f0e 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
#include <linux/aer.h>
#include <linux/nmi.h>
+#include <acpi/actbl1.h>
#include <acpi/ghes.h>
#include <acpi/apei.h>
#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
@@ -244,10 +245,22 @@ static struct ghes *ghes_new(struct acpi_hest_generic *generic)
struct ghes *ghes;
unsigned int error_block_length;
int rc;
+ struct acpi_hest_header *hest_hdr;
ghes = kzalloc(sizeof(*ghes), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ghes)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+ hest_hdr = (struct acpi_hest_header *)generic;
+ if (hest_hdr->type == ACPI_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_ERROR_V2) {
+ ghes->generic_v2 = (struct acpi_hest_generic_v2 *)generic;
+ rc = apei_map_generic_address(
+ &ghes->generic_v2->read_ack_register);
+ if (rc)
+ goto err_unmap;
+ } else
+ ghes->generic_v2 = NULL;
Since you kzalloc ghes, shouldn't ghes->generic_v2 be NULL already?
Yes, the documentation says kzalloc returns memory set to zero, so I
will remove this else statement.
+
ghes->generic = generic;
rc = apei_map_generic_address(&generic->error_status_address);
if (rc)
@@ -270,6 +283,9 @@ static struct ghes *ghes_new(struct acpi_hest_generic *generic)
err_unmap:
apei_unmap_generic_address(&generic->error_status_address);
+ if (ghes->generic_v2)
+ apei_unmap_generic_address(
+ &ghes->generic_v2->read_ack_register);
err_free:
kfree(ghes);
return ERR_PTR(rc);
@@ -279,6 +295,9 @@ static void ghes_fini(struct ghes *ghes)
{
kfree(ghes->estatus);
apei_unmap_generic_address(&ghes->generic->error_status_address);
+ if (ghes->generic_v2)
+ apei_unmap_generic_address(
+ &ghes->generic_v2->read_ack_register);
}
static inline int ghes_severity(int severity)
@@ -648,6 +667,22 @@ static void ghes_estatus_cache_add(
rcu_read_unlock();
}
+static int ghes_do_read_ack(struct acpi_hest_generic_v2 *generic_v2)
+{
+ int rc;
+ u64 val = 0;
+
+ rc = apei_read(&val, &generic_v2->read_ack_register);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+ val &= generic_v2->read_ack_preserve <<
+ generic_v2->read_ack_register.bit_offset;
+ val |= generic_v2->read_ack_write;
Reading the spec, it is not clear whether you need the left shift
above.
Having said that, if you do it for read_ack_preserve, do you also need
to left shift read_ack_write by read_ack_register.bit_offset?
Good catch, it looks like the read_ack_write should also get this shift.
I'm using a shift of 0 so I didn't catch this in testing :)
+ rc = apei_write(val, &generic_v2->read_ack_register);
+
+ return rc;
+}
+
static int ghes_proc(struct ghes *ghes)
{
int rc;
@@ -660,6 +695,12 @@ static int ghes_proc(struct ghes *ghes)
ghes_estatus_cache_add(ghes->generic, ghes->estatus);
}
ghes_do_proc(ghes, ghes->estatus);
+
+ if (ghes->generic_v2) {
+ rc = ghes_do_read_ack(ghes->generic_v2);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+ }
out:
ghes_clear_estatus(ghes);
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c
index 792a0d9..ef725a9 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ static const int hest_esrc_len_tab[ACPI_HEST_TYPE_RESERVED] = {
[ACPI_HEST_TYPE_AER_ENDPOINT] = sizeof(struct acpi_hest_aer),
[ACPI_HEST_TYPE_AER_BRIDGE] = sizeof(struct acpi_hest_aer_bridge),
[ACPI_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_ERROR] = sizeof(struct acpi_hest_generic),
+ [ACPI_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_ERROR_V2] = sizeof(struct acpi_hest_generic_v2),
};
static int hest_esrc_len(struct acpi_hest_header *hest_hdr)
@@ -146,7 +147,8 @@ static int __init hest_parse_ghes_count(struct acpi_hest_header *hest_hdr, void
{
int *count = data;
- if (hest_hdr->type == ACPI_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_ERROR)
+ if (hest_hdr->type == ACPI_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_ERROR ||
+ hest_hdr->type == ACPI_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_ERROR_V2)
(*count)++;
return 0;
}
@@ -157,7 +159,8 @@ static int __init hest_parse_ghes(struct acpi_hest_header *hest_hdr, void *data)
struct ghes_arr *ghes_arr = data;
int rc, i;
- if (hest_hdr->type != ACPI_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_ERROR)
+ if (hest_hdr->type != ACPI_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_ERROR &&
+ hest_hdr->type != ACPI_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_ERROR_V2)
return 0;
if (!((struct acpi_hest_generic *)hest_hdr)->enabled)
diff --git a/include/acpi/ghes.h b/include/acpi/ghes.h
index 720446c..d0108b6 100644
--- a/include/acpi/ghes.h
+++ b/include/acpi/ghes.h
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
struct ghes {
struct acpi_hest_generic *generic;
+ struct acpi_hest_generic_v2 *generic_v2;
You either have a GHES or a GHESv2 structure. Instead of duplication,
could this be represented as a union?
Thanks,
Punit
I think that should be doable. I'll make these changes in the next version.
Thanks,
Tyler
struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus;
u64 buffer_paddr;
unsigned long flags;
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
