Re: [PATCH] EFI: make for_each_efi_memory_desc_in_map() cope with running on Xen

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/09/2016, 03:39 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 09.08.16 at 15:03, <jslaby@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 08/09/2016, 12:16 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> While commit 55f1ea15216 ("efi: Fix for_each_efi_memory_desc_in_map()
>>> for empty memmaps") made an attempt to deal with empty memory maps, it
>>> didn't address the case where the desc_size field never gets set, as is
>>> apparently the case when running under Xen.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
>>> Tested-by: <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  include/linux/efi.h |    2 +-
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> --- 4.8-rc1/include/linux/efi.h
>>> +++ 4.8-rc1-EFI-memdesc-iterator-Xen/include/linux/efi.h
>>> @@ -946,7 +946,7 @@ extern int efi_memattr_apply_permissions
>>>  /* Iterate through an efi_memory_map */
>>>  #define for_each_efi_memory_desc_in_map(m, md)				   \
>>>  	for ((md) = (m)->map;						   \
>>> -	     ((void *)(md) + (m)->desc_size) <= (m)->map_end;		   \
>>> +	     ((void *)(md) + (m)->desc_size - 1) < (m)->map_end;	   \
>>
>> Is there any specific reason you change both the size and the comparator?
>>
>> IMO, either (readable)
>>   ((void *)(md) + (m)->desc_size) < (m)->map_end;
>> or (mindfuck version)
>>   ((void *)(md) + (m)->desc_size - 1) <= (m)->map_end;
>> is correct, not their mix.
> 
> We're not talking about an off-by-one getting fixed here: map_end
> points past the valid range. The adjustment leverages overflow (or
> underflow, to be precise) to produce correct behavior when
> (m)->desc_size is zero.

And what would be map_end in case desc_size is zero so that the test fails?

Anyway, if I understand correctly, you subtract one from the pointer.
Note that behaviour of this is undefined according to the C standard and
may result in unpredictable results. Pointer can only point inside an
object (or array) or one element *past* the end, not before.

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux