Re: MemoryOverwriteRequestControl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 20:37 +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> Random question: Does anybody (kernel or distros) do anything with 
> the MemoryOverwriteRequestControl EFI variable? I was asked by a 
> platform engineer for input on what Linux needs, and I didn't have an 
> answer for him.

The usual answer for these cases is to do what Tianocore does.

Currently, the kernel does nothing with this, but you'd more expect
something in userspace to do something with it, probably a component of
the TSS.

> Reference: section 5 of
> https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/Platform-Res
> et-Attack-Mitigation-Specification.pdf

That's a bit of an old Spec.  Microsoft has been busy updating this
stuff:

https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/hardware/drivers/bringup/device-guard-requirements

Tianocore head seems to do all of this.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux