On 06/19/2016 04:38 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 03:14:40PM +0200, Môshe van der Sterre wrote:
On 06/02/2016 11:24 AM, Matt Fleming wrote:
If this does indeed fix Andy's immediate issue (and it looks like
it would) I'm happy to apply this as an interim solution.
I have tested that this does indeed fix the warning for Andy's value of
->image_address, but off course I can't test this with the actual hardware
that Andy has. Do you want me to resend this with a commit message so it can
be applied?
With a commit message and a clearer pr_notice than "is bogus", yes. How
about "image address not a valid physical memory address"?
The sub-par notice text crossed my mind when I originally mailed it, but
I forgot about it today. I like your suggestion so I'll use that one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
