On Fri, 06 May, at 04:32:06PM, Shannon Zhao wrote: > From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Add a new function to parse DT parameters for Xen specific UEFI just > like the way for normal UEFI. Then it could reuse the existing codes. > > If Xen supports EFI, initialize runtime services. This commit log would benefit from a little expansion. I'd like to see information that answers the following questions, - How do the Xen DT paramters differ from bare metal? - What existing code is reused with your patch? - How are Xen runtime services different from bare metal? - Why is it OK to force enable EFI runtime services for Xen? I think it would also be good to explicitly state that we do not expect to find both Xen EFI DT parameters and bare metal EFI DT parameters when performing the search; the two should be mutually exclusive. > CC: Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Drop using of EFI_PARAVIRT. Discussion can be found from [1]. > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/29/8 > --- > arch/arm/include/asm/efi.h | 2 + > arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 16 ++++++++ > arch/arm64/include/asm/efi.h | 2 + > drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > 5 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/efi.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/efi.h > index e0eea72..5ba4343 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/efi.h > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/efi.h > @@ -52,9 +52,11 @@ static inline void efi_set_pgd(struct mm_struct *mm) > > void efi_virtmap_load(void); > void efi_virtmap_unload(void); > +int xen_arm_enable_runtime_services(void); > > #else > #define efi_init() > +#define xen_arm_enable_runtime_services() (0) > #endif /* CONFIG_EFI */ > > /* arch specific definitions used by the stub code */ > diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c > index 13e3e9f..3362870 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c > +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ > #include <asm/xen/hypervisor.h> > #include <asm/xen/hypercall.h> > #include <asm/system_misc.h> > +#include <asm/efi.h> > #include <linux/interrupt.h> > #include <linux/irqreturn.h> > #include <linux/module.h> > @@ -261,6 +262,13 @@ static int __init fdt_find_hyper_node(unsigned long node, const char *uname, > !strncmp(hyper_node.prefix, s, strlen(hyper_node.prefix))) > hyper_node.version = s + strlen(hyper_node.prefix); > > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XEN_EFI)) { > + /* Check if Xen supports EFI */ > + if ((of_get_flat_dt_subnode_by_name(node, "uefi") > 0) && > + !efi_runtime_disabled()) > + set_bit(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES, &efi.flags); > + } > + > return 0; > } > The above comment could do with including similar information to the commit log as to why we want to force enable runtime services. For x86 we have this, * * When EFI_PARAVIRT is in force then we could not map runtime * service memory region because we do not have direct access to it. * However, runtime services are available through proxy functions * (e.g. in case of Xen dom0 EFI implementation they call special * hypercall which executes relevant EFI functions) and that is why * they are always enabled. */ We need something similar here. > @@ -338,6 +346,7 @@ static int __init xen_guest_init(void) > { > struct xen_add_to_physmap xatp; > struct shared_info *shared_info_page = NULL; > + int ret; > > if (!xen_domain()) > return 0; > @@ -352,6 +361,13 @@ static int __init xen_guest_init(void) > return -ENODEV; > } > > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XEN_EFI) && efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT) && > + efi_enabled(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES)) { > + ret = xen_arm_enable_runtime_services(); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + } > + Is it ever possible to have EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES set but efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT) and IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XEN_EFI) be false inside this function? If the answer is "no", I'd suggest just reducing this down to, /* * The fdt parsing code will have set EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES if * it found Xen EFI parameters. Force enable runtime services. */ if (efi_enabled(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES)) { ret = xen_arm_enable_runtime_services(); if (ret) return ret; } But first, see my comments below. > @@ -39,6 +40,33 @@ static struct mm_struct efi_mm = { > .mmlist = LIST_HEAD_INIT(efi_mm.mmlist), > }; > > +static int __init efi_remap_init(void) > +{ > + u64 mapsize; > + > + pr_info("Remapping and enabling EFI services.\n"); > + > + mapsize = memmap.map_end - memmap.map; > + memmap.map = (__force void *)ioremap_cache(memmap.phys_map, > + mapsize); > + if (!memmap.map) { > + pr_err("Failed to remap EFI memory map\n"); > + return -ENOMEM; > + } > + memmap.map_end = memmap.map + mapsize; > + efi.memmap = &memmap; > + > + efi.systab = (__force void *)ioremap_cache(efi_system_table, > + sizeof(efi_system_table_t)); > + if (!efi.systab) { > + pr_err("Failed to remap EFI System Table\n"); > + return -ENOMEM; > + } > + set_bit(EFI_SYSTEM_TABLES, &efi.flags); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static bool __init efi_virtmap_init(void) > { > efi_memory_desc_t *md; > @@ -75,7 +103,7 @@ static bool __init efi_virtmap_init(void) > */ > static int __init arm_enable_runtime_services(void) > { > - u64 mapsize; > + int ret; > > if (!efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT)) { > pr_info("EFI services will not be available.\n"); > @@ -87,25 +115,14 @@ static int __init arm_enable_runtime_services(void) > return 0; > } > > - pr_info("Remapping and enabling EFI services.\n"); > - > - mapsize = memmap.map_end - memmap.map; > - memmap.map = (__force void *)ioremap_cache(memmap.phys_map, > - mapsize); > - if (!memmap.map) { > - pr_err("Failed to remap EFI memory map\n"); > - return -ENOMEM; > + if (efi_enabled(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES)) { > + pr_info("EFI runtime services access via paravirt.\n"); > + return 0; > } > - memmap.map_end = memmap.map + mapsize; > - efi.memmap = &memmap; > > - efi.systab = (__force void *)ioremap_cache(efi_system_table, > - sizeof(efi_system_table_t)); > - if (!efi.systab) { > - pr_err("Failed to remap EFI System Table\n"); > - return -ENOMEM; > - } > - set_bit(EFI_SYSTEM_TABLES, &efi.flags); > + ret = efi_remap_init(); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > > if (!efi_virtmap_init()) { > pr_err("No UEFI virtual mapping was installed -- runtime services will not be available\n"); > @@ -122,6 +139,23 @@ static int __init arm_enable_runtime_services(void) > } > early_initcall(arm_enable_runtime_services); > > +int __init xen_arm_enable_runtime_services(void) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + ret = efi_remap_init(); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XEN_EFI)) { > + /* Set up runtime services function pointers for Xen Dom0 */ > + xen_efi_runtime_setup(); > + efi.runtime_version = efi.systab->hdr.revision; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} Since you call efi_remap_init() in both of these functions, couldn't you leave the existing code alone and bail after setting up the memory map and systab in arm_enable_runtime_services()? Also, why do you need to setup efi.runtime_version here? Isn't that done inside uefi_init()? Here is how I would have expected this patch to look: - Add FDT code to find hypervisor EFI params - Force enable EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES for Xen and call xen_efi_runtime_setup() inside xen_guest_init() - Change arm_enable_runtime_services() to handle the case where EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES is already set Am I misunderstanding some ordering issues? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
