On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
At the absolute minimum, we should be logging (at least at a warning level) that we had to fall back the the backup GPT. If somebody is dealing with a disk that had a torn write to the primary GPT, that's one thing, but this could also be caused by any number of other problems (hardware issues, malicious intent, etc), and we need to log that we detected corrupted data.
We already complain about corrupted primary gpt (at a warn level), and there's also plenty of verbosity about differences between primary and backup (see compare_gpts()), or are you referring to something else? Thanks, Davidlohr -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
