(+ Laszlo) On 25 April 2016 at 12:15, Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 24 Apr, at 10:22:41PM, Matt Fleming wrote: >> >> I like this series a lot (well, ignoring the fact that the firmware is >> trying to eat itself). The runtime call code is much cleaner now, and >> this is a great precedent for any future multi-architecture quirks we >> may need. >> >> Queued for v4.7, thanks everyone! > > Hmm... Booting this series with Qemu and OVMF results in lots of > warnings, > > [ 0.102173] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 0.103000] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at /dev/shm/mfleming/git/efi/drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c:30 efi_call_virt_check_flags+0x69/0x90 > [ 0.103505] Modules linked in: > [ 0.104519] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.6.0-rc4+ #1 > [ 0.105000] 0000000000000000 ffffffff81e03e30 ffffffff8132206f 0000000000000000 > [ 0.105000] 0000000000000000 ffffffff81e03e70 ffffffff8105a47c 0000001e0000000a > [ 0.105000] 0000000000000246 0000000000000286 ffffffff81bed975 ffffffff81e03f10 > [ 0.105000] Call Trace: > [ 0.105000] [<ffffffff8132206f>] dump_stack+0x4d/0x6e > [ 0.105000] [<ffffffff8105a47c>] __warn+0xcc/0xf0 > [ 0.105000] [<ffffffff8105a558>] warn_slowpath_null+0x18/0x20 > [ 0.105000] [<ffffffff8164e5a9>] efi_call_virt_check_flags+0x69/0x90 > [ 0.105000] [<ffffffff8164f9d2>] virt_efi_set_variable+0x82/0x190 > [ 0.105000] [<ffffffff81054555>] efi_delete_dummy_variable+0x75/0x80 > [ 0.105000] [<ffffffff81f599f6>] efi_enter_virtual_mode+0x463/0x472 > [ 0.105000] [<ffffffff81f41f82>] start_kernel+0x38f/0x415 > [ 0.105000] [<ffffffff81f419e1>] ? set_init_arg+0x55/0x55 > [ 0.105000] [<ffffffff81f415ee>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c > [ 0.105000] [<ffffffff81f416da>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xea/0xed > [ 0.107181] ---[ end trace 0081cc453369d969 ]--- > [ 0.107499] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint > [ 0.108226] [Firmware Bug]: IRQ flags corrupted (0x00000246=>0x00000286) by EFI set_variable > > Has anyone tested this series on x86 to ensure that this is a rare > case? I'll go and test some physical x86 machines now. I suppose that it is quite likely that this issue occurs in the wild if it is present in OVMF. Could anyone check which flag is actually clobbered here? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
