On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 07:05:32PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 21 April 2016 at 13:35, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > @@ -25,8 +27,11 @@
> > #define efi_call_virt(f, args...) \
> > ({ \
> > efi_status_t __s; \
> > + unsigned long flags; \
> > arch_efi_call_virt_setup(); \
> > + local_save_flags(flags); \
> > __s = arch_efi_call_virt(f, args); \
> > + efi_call_virt_check_flags(flags, __stringify(f)); \
> > arch_efi_call_virt_teardown(); \
> > __s; \
> > })
> > @@ -35,12 +40,29 @@
> > #ifndef __efi_call_virt
> > #define __efi_call_virt(f, args...) \
> > ({ \
> > + unsigned long flags; \
> > arch_efi_call_virt_setup(); \
> > + local_irq_save(flags); \
>
> We shouldn't disable interrupts here. I assume this is a typo, and you
> intended to use local_save_flags() as above?
Oh, yes. That's an impressive mistake on my behalf; thanks for spotting
that!
I've been seeing issues with GetVariable and GetNextVariable, which
happen to only exercise the correct macro above.
> Other than that, this series looks fine to me.
>
> With the above fixed:
>
> For the series (except the x86 patch)
>
> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cheers!
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
