On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 4:55 PM, David Daney <ddaney.cavm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Add device tree parsing for NUMA topology using device > "numa-node-id" property in distance-map and cpu nodes. > > This is a complete rewrite of a previous patch by: > Ganapatrao Kulkarni<gkulkarni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/of/Kconfig | 3 + > drivers/of/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/of/of_numa.c | 200 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/of.h | 9 +++ > 4 files changed, 213 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/of/of_numa.c > > diff --git a/drivers/of/Kconfig b/drivers/of/Kconfig > index e2a4841..b3bec3a 100644 > --- a/drivers/of/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/of/Kconfig > @@ -112,4 +112,7 @@ config OF_OVERLAY > While this option is selected automatically when needed, you can > enable it manually to improve device tree unit test coverage. > > +config OF_NUMA > + bool > + > endif # OF > diff --git a/drivers/of/Makefile b/drivers/of/Makefile > index 156c072..bee3fa9 100644 > --- a/drivers/of/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/of/Makefile > @@ -14,5 +14,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_OF_MTD) += of_mtd.o > obj-$(CONFIG_OF_RESERVED_MEM) += of_reserved_mem.o > obj-$(CONFIG_OF_RESOLVE) += resolver.o > obj-$(CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY) += overlay.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_OF_NUMA) += of_numa.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_OF_UNITTEST) += unittest-data/ > diff --git a/drivers/of/of_numa.c b/drivers/of/of_numa.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..9727b60 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/of/of_numa.c > @@ -0,0 +1,200 @@ > +/* > + * OF NUMA Parsing support. > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2015 - 2016 Cavium Inc. > + * > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as > + * published by the Free Software Foundation. > + * > + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the > + * GNU General Public License for more details. > + * > + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License > + * along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. > + */ > + > +#include <linux/of.h> > +#include <linux/of_fdt.h> This can be dropped now. > +#include <linux/nodemask.h> > + > +#include <asm/numa.h> > + > +/* define default numa node to 0 */ > +#define DEFAULT_NODE 0 > + > +/* > + * Even though we connect cpus to numa domains later in SMP > + * init, we need to know the node ids now for all cpus. > +*/ > +static void __init of_find_cpu_nodes(void) Perhaps of_parse_cpu_nodes for consistency. Actually, if all the functions were prefixed with "of_numa_" that would be better. > +{ > + u32 nid; > + int r; > + struct device_node *np = NULL; > + > + for (;;) { > + np = of_find_node_by_type(np, "cpu"); > + if (!np) > + break; Can't we use the child node iterator for /cpus here? > + > + r = of_property_read_u32(np, "numa-node-id", &nid); > + if (r) > + continue; > + > + pr_debug("NUMA: CPU on %u\n", nid); > + if (nid >= MAX_NUMNODES) > + pr_warn("NUMA: Node id %u exceeds maximum value\n", > + nid); > + else > + node_set(nid, numa_nodes_parsed); I'm not sure how this works, but don't you need to match this up with MPIDR of the cpu here? > + } > +} > + > +static void __init of_parse_memory_nodes(void) > +{ > + struct device_node *np = NULL; > + int na, ns; > + const __be32 *prop; > + unsigned int psize; > + u32 nid; > + u64 base, size; > + int r; > + > + for (;;) { > + np = of_find_node_by_type(np, "memory"); > + if (!np) > + break; > + > + r = of_property_read_u32(np, "numa-node-id", &nid); > + if (r) > + continue; > + > + prop = of_get_property(np, "reg", &psize); > + if (!prop) > + continue; > + > + psize /= sizeof(__be32); > + na = of_n_addr_cells(np); > + ns = of_n_size_cells(np); > + > + if (psize < na + ns) { > + pr_err("NUMA: memory reg property too small\n"); > + continue; > + } > + base = of_read_number(prop, na); > + size = of_read_number(prop + na, ns); You should be able to use of_address_to_resource for all this. > + > + pr_debug("NUMA: base = %llx len = %llx, node = %u\n", > + base, size, nid); > + > + if (numa_add_memblk(nid, base, size) < 0) > + break; > + } > + > + of_node_put(np); > +} > + > +static int __init parse_distance_map_v1(struct device_node *map) > +{ > + const __be32 *matrix; > + unsigned int matrix_size; > + int entry_count; > + int i; > + int nr_size_cells = OF_ROOT_NODE_SIZE_CELLS_DEFAULT; I believe the defaults are for some old DT files. As this is new, it should rely on explicit #size-cells in the DT. OTOH, what is point of using #size-cells at all versus fixing the sizes to 1 cell. The documentation doesn't indicate that it uses #size-cells. That also means that the sizes basically follow the cell size for the memory given that this is at the top-level. > + > + pr_info("NUMA: parsing numa-distance-map-v1\n"); > + > + matrix = of_get_property(map, "distance-matrix", &matrix_size); > + if (!matrix) { > + pr_err("NUMA: No distance-matrix property in distance-map\n"); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + entry_count = matrix_size / (sizeof(__be32) * 3 * nr_size_cells); > + > + for (i = 0; i < entry_count; i++) { > + u32 nodea, nodeb, distance; > + > + nodea = of_read_number(matrix, nr_size_cells); > + matrix += nr_size_cells; > + nodeb = of_read_number(matrix, nr_size_cells); > + matrix += nr_size_cells; > + distance = of_read_number(matrix, nr_size_cells); > + matrix += nr_size_cells; Assuming you fix this to 1 cell, you can use of_property_count_u32_elems and of_property_read_u32_array. > + > + numa_set_distance(nodea, nodeb, distance); > + pr_debug("NUMA: distance[node%d -> node%d] = %d\n", > + nodea, nodeb, distance); > + > + /* Set default distance of node B->A same as A->B */ > + if (nodeb > nodea) > + numa_set_distance(nodeb, nodea, distance); > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int __init of_parse_distance_map(void) > +{ > + int ret = -EINVAL; > + struct device_node *np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, "distance-map"); > + > + if (!np) > + return ret; > + > + if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "numa-distance-map-v1")) { You can use of_find_compatible_node() instead of these 2 calls. > + ret = parse_distance_map_v1(np); > + goto out; > + } > + > + pr_err("NUMA: invalid distance-map device node\n"); > +out: > + of_node_put(np); > + return ret; > +} > + > +int of_node_to_nid(struct device_node *device) > +{ > + struct device_node *np; > + u32 nid; > + int r = -ENODATA; > + > + np = of_node_get(device); > + > + while (np) { > + struct device_node *parent; > + > + r = of_property_read_u32(np, "numa-node-id", &nid); > + if (r != -EINVAL) You want to break for other err values? > + break; > + > + /* property doesn't exist in this node, look in parent */ > + parent = of_get_parent(np); > + of_node_put(np); > + np = parent; > + } > + if (np && r) > + pr_warn("NUMA: Invalid \"numa-node-id\" property in node %s\n", > + np->name); > + of_node_put(np); > + > + if (!r) { > + if (nid >= MAX_NUMNODES) > + pr_warn("NUMA: Node id %u exceeds maximum value\n", > + nid); > + else > + return nid; > + } > + > + return NUMA_NO_NODE; > +} Needs to be exported? > + > +int __init of_numa_init(void) > +{ > + of_find_cpu_nodes(); > + of_parse_memory_nodes(); > + return of_parse_distance_map(); > +} > diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h > index dc6e396..fe67a4c 100644 > --- a/include/linux/of.h > +++ b/include/linux/of.h > @@ -685,6 +685,15 @@ static inline int of_node_to_nid(struct device_node *device) > } > #endif > > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF_NUMA > +extern int of_numa_init(void); > +#else > +static inline int of_numa_init(void) > +{ > + return -ENOSYS; > +} > +#endif > + > static inline struct device_node *of_find_matching_node( > struct device_node *from, > const struct of_device_id *matches) > -- > 1.8.3.1 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
