(Adding Joe)
On Wed, 17 Feb, at 09:09:51AM, Peter Jones wrote:
> Add a comment documenting why EFI GUIDs are laid out like they are.
> Ideally I'd like to change all the ", " to "," too, but right now the
> format is such that checkpatch won't complain with new ones, and staring
> at checkpatch didn't get me anywhere towards making that work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Jones <pjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/efi.h | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/efi.h b/include/linux/efi.h
> index 99b88c5..3c27c88 100644
> --- a/include/linux/efi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/efi.h
> @@ -533,7 +533,22 @@ typedef efi_status_t efi_query_variable_store_t(u32 attributes,
> void efi_native_runtime_setup(void);
>
> /*
> - * EFI Configuration Table and GUID definitions
> + * EFI Configuration Table and GUID definitions
> + *
> + * These should be formatted roughly like the ones in the UEFI SPEC has
> + * them. It makes them easier to grep for, and they look the same when
> + * you're staring at them. Here's the guide:
> + *
> + * GUID: 12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789012
> + * Spec:
> + * #define EFI_SOME_PROTOCOL_GUID \
> + * {0x12345678,0x1234,0x1234,\
> + * {0x12,0x34,0x12,0x34,0x56,0x78,0x90,0x12}}
> + * Here:
> + * #define SOME_PROTOCOL_GUID \
> + * EFI_GUID(0x12345678, 0x1234, 0x1234, \
> + * 0x12, 0x34, 0x12, 0x34, 0x56, 0x78, 0x90, 0x12)
> + * ^ tab ^tab ^ space
> */
> #define NULL_GUID \
> EFI_GUID(0x00000000, 0x0000, 0x0000, \
We do need some kind of comment to explain that the formatting is
important in this file, but I'm wondering whether Joe has any
suggestions for how to make checkpatch.pl ignore the "," change.
Joe?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
