* Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Peter Jones <pjones@xxxxxxxxxx> > > This reformats the GUID definitions in include/linux/efi.h so that if > you add another one with the same style, checkpatch won't complain about > it. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Jones <pjones@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > include/linux/efi.h | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/efi.h b/include/linux/efi.h > index 09f1559e7525..f468f7c53236 100644 > --- a/include/linux/efi.h > +++ b/include/linux/efi.h > @@ -535,67 +535,88 @@ void efi_native_runtime_setup(void); > * EFI Configuration Table and GUID definitions > */ > #define NULL_GUID \ > - EFI_GUID( 0x00000000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00 ) > + EFI_GUID(0x00000000, 0x0000, 0x0000, \ > + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00) > > #define MPS_TABLE_GUID \ > - EFI_GUID( 0xeb9d2d2f, 0x2d88, 0x11d3, 0x9a, 0x16, 0x0, 0x90, 0x27, 0x3f, 0xc1, 0x4d ) > + EFI_GUID(0xeb9d2d2f, 0x2d88, 0x11d3, \ > + 0x9a, 0x16, 0x00, 0x90, 0x27, 0x3f, 0xc1, 0x4d) So I really think this is a step backwards. Checkpatch should be fixed/enhanced to allow targeted exemption. Something like: #define CHECKPATCH_IGNORE ... #undef CHECKPATCH_IGNORE ... which checkpatch would parse and interpret accordingly. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
