Re: [PATCH 2/4] efi: efivars: don't rely on blocking operations in non-blocking set_var()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 27 Nov, at 09:18:36PM, Matt Fleming wrote:
> 
> I *think* that'd be OK. The thing I wanted to avoid was a
> proliferation of nonblocking versions of the standard EFI calls, but
> limiting it to adding query_variable_info() doesn't seem too bad.
> 
> Let me think about it over the weekend. 

I couldn't come up with anything better. Go for it!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux