On 10/27/2015 09:06 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-stub.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-stub.c
index 816120ece6bc..a60ce249cfc0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-stub.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-stub.c
@@ -42,7 +42,8 @@
* Mustang), we can still place the kernel at the address
* 'dram_base + TEXT_OFFSET'.
*/
- *image_addr = *reserve_addr = dram_base + TEXT_OFFSET;
+ *image_addr = *reserve_addr = round_up(dram_base, SZ_2M) +
+ TEXT_OFFSET);
nr_pages = round_up(kernel_memsize, EFI_ALLOC_ALIGN) /
EFI_PAGE_SIZE;
status = efi_call_early(allocate_pages, EFI_ALLOCATE_ADDRESS,
Tested-by: Timur Tabi <timur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
However, I think this formatting is easier to read:
*image_addr = *reserve_addr =
round_up(dram_base, SZ_2M) + TEXT_OFFSET;
This does make the kernel boot, but we suspect that there may be another
problem. We need to investigate it, but we have a suspicion that the
EFI stub is trying to allocate from the Runtime Data block, and the
alignment adjustment "fixes" the problem by moving the pointer to
Conventional Memory.
Anyway, is there any chance we can get this fix into 4.3? I'd hate to
have 4.3 released knowing that it's broken on our hardware.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
