On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:40:53PM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
> BGRT can legitimately be a different version from what we support, and
> that's a problem with the driver not supporting something, not an error
> that needs to be surfaced to the user.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Jones <pjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
Are you actually seeing this error on a real system? Or is this just a
theoretical concern with some future version?
While I agree that this doesn't need to be pr_err, I don't think
pr_debug is appropriate either. It may mean the driver needs updating,
or it may mean that a system in the wild is actually broken and has an
invalid version number. I'd prefer at least pr_warn so that people see
it and report it, but I could live with pr_notice; that should hide it
from systems booting in quiet mode, while still having it in the log
even on non-debug kernels.
- Josh Triplett
> arch/x86/platform/efi/efi-bgrt.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi-bgrt.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi-bgrt.c
> index d7f997f..e568701 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi-bgrt.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi-bgrt.c
> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ void __init efi_bgrt_init(void)
> return;
> }
> if (bgrt_tab->version != 1) {
> - pr_err("Ignoring BGRT: invalid version %u (expected 1)\n",
> + pr_debug("Ignoring BGRT: invalid version %u (expected 1)\n",
> bgrt_tab->version);
> return;
> }
> --
> 2.4.3
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
