Re: [PATCH 6/8] arm64/efi: ignore DT memory nodes instead of removing them

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12 May 2015 at 16:31, Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 08:41:58AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> There are two problems with the UEFI stub DT memory node removal
>> routine:
>> - it deletes nodes as it traverses the tree, which happens to work
>>   but is not supported, as deletion invalidates the node iterator;
>> - deleting memory nodes entirely may discard annotations in the form
>>   of additional properties on the nodes.
>>
>> Now that the UEFI initialization has moved to an earlier stage, we can
>> actually just ignore any memblocks that are installed after we have
>> processed the UEFI memory map. This way, it is no longer necessary to
>> remove the nodes, so we can remove that logic from the stub as well.
>
> So ... I don't have an issue with this patch as such, but keeping the
> memory nodes around for NUMA topology when the UEFI memory map is
> the one being used for memblock leads to a spooky redefinition of what
> that memory node _is_; it would now describe a region which may only
> partially be populated with RAM.
>

How does that not apply to ACPI? It is still the responsibility of the
firmware to ensure that all information it supplies is consistent with
itself.

But I agree that we should carefully consider this interaction before
accepting any NUMA changes to the memnode bindings and implementation.

-- 
Ard.


>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/mm/init.c               |  7 +++++++
>>  drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/fdt.c | 24 +-----------------------
>>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
>> index 64480b65ef17..95c239f43384 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
>> @@ -386,6 +386,13 @@ __setup("keepinitrd", keepinitrd_setup);
>>
>>  void __init early_init_dt_add_memory_arch(u64 base, u64 size)
>>  {
>> +     /*
>> +      * EFI_MEMMAP will be set /after/ UEFI has installed all memory based
>> +      * on the content of the UEFI memory map.
>> +      */
>> +     if (efi_enabled(EFI_MEMMAP))
>> +             return;
>> +
>>       if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(base)) {
>>               if (size < PAGE_SIZE - (base & ~PAGE_MASK)) {
>>                       pr_warn("Ignoring memory block 0x%llx - 0x%llx\n",
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/fdt.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/fdt.c
>> index ef5d764e2a27..343e7992bd8f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/fdt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/fdt.c
>> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ efi_status_t update_fdt(efi_system_table_t *sys_table, void *orig_fdt,
>>                       unsigned long map_size, unsigned long desc_size,
>>                       u32 desc_ver)
>>  {
>> -     int node, prev, num_rsv;
>> +     int node, num_rsv;
>>       int status;
>>       u32 fdt_val32;
>>       u64 fdt_val64;
>> @@ -54,28 +54,6 @@ efi_status_t update_fdt(efi_system_table_t *sys_table, void *orig_fdt,
>>               goto fdt_set_fail;
>>
>>       /*
>> -      * Delete any memory nodes present. We must delete nodes which
>> -      * early_init_dt_scan_memory may try to use.
>> -      */
>> -     prev = 0;
>> -     for (;;) {
>> -             const char *type;
>> -             int len;
>> -
>> -             node = fdt_next_node(fdt, prev, NULL);
>> -             if (node < 0)
>> -                     break;
>> -
>> -             type = fdt_getprop(fdt, node, "device_type", &len);
>> -             if (type && strncmp(type, "memory", len) == 0) {
>> -                     fdt_del_node(fdt, node);
>> -                     continue;
>> -             }
>> -
>> -             prev = node;
>> -     }
>> -
>> -     /*
>>        * Delete all memory reserve map entries. When booting via UEFI,
>>        * kernel will use the UEFI memory map to find reserved regions.
>>        */
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux