On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:52:48AM -0400, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:44:56PM +0800, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote: > >> From: "Kweh, Hock Leong" <hock.leong.kweh@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Introducing a kernel module to expose capsule loader interface > >> for user to upload capsule binaries. This module leverage the > >> request_firmware_direct_full_path() to obtain the binary at a > >> specific path input by user. > >> > >> Example method to load the capsule binary: > >> echo -n "/path/to/capsule/binary" > /sys/devices/platform/efi_capsule_loader/capsule_loader > > > > Ick, why not just have the firmware file location present, and copy it > > to the sysfs file directly from userspace, instead of this two-step > > process? > > Because it's not at all obvious how error handling should work in that case. I don't understand how the error handling is any different. The kernel ends up copying the data in through the firmware interface both ways, we just aren't creating yet-another-firmware-path in the system. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
