On Fri, 10 Apr, at 07:14:34PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > It is not such a big deal: the memory is reclaimed anyway, I was just > trying to reduce the fragmentation a bit, and trying to avoid > efi_xxx_alloc() which are substantially heavier than calling > allocate_pool() or allocate_pages() directly. Out of curiosity, do you have any runtime numbers to backup the claim that allocate_*() is substantially more lightweight? -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
